Mathematics High School

## Answers

**Answer 1**

In the given** rhombus** ABCD, the measure of angle DAC is 60 degrees.

In a rhombus, opposite angles are congruent. Therefore, m∠BCD = m∠CAB.

Since m∠BCD = 120, we have m∠CAB = 120.

In a rhombus, adjacent angles are supplementary. Therefore, m∠CAB + m∠DAC = 180.

Substituting the value of m∠CAB as 120, we get 120 + m∠DAC = 180.

Solving for m∠DAC, we find m∠DAC = 180 - 120 = 60.

The **correct answer** to the measure of angle DAC in the **Quadrilateral** (rhombus) ABCD is 60 degrees.

To learn more about **rhombus**

https://brainly.com/question/26154016

#SPJ11

## Related Questions

solve the lp by excel solver and then answer the following questions based on the sensitivity report of the original lp. you are not allowed to re-solve the lp for each of the questions.

### Answers

By analyzing the sensitivity report, you can gain insights into the **stability** and flexibility of the optimal **solution** without the need for re-solving the LP problem.

To solve a linear programming (LP) problem using Excel Solver, you can follow these steps:

1. Open Excel and enter the LP problem in a spreadsheet. Define the decision variables, objective function, and constraints.

2. Install the Solver add-in if it is not already installed. You can find the Solver add-in in the "Data" tab under "Analysis."

3. Go to the "Data" tab and click on "Solver" to open the Solver dialog box.

4. In the Solver dialog box, set the objective cell to the target cell of your LP problem. Select either "Min" or "Max" depending on whether you want to minimize or maximize the objective.

5. Define the decision variable cells as the changing cells.

6. Add the constraints by clicking on the "Add" button in the Solver dialog box. Specify the constraint cells and their respective relationships (e.g., <=, =, >=).

7. Set any additional Solver options if necessary, such as limiting the solution to integer values.

8. Click "Solve" to find the optimal solution. Excel Solver will adjust the decision variables to optimize the objective function while satisfying the **constraints**.

Once you have solved the LP problem using Excel Solver, you can use the sensitivity report to analyze the results. The sensitivity report provides information on the impact of changes to the objective function coefficients and constraint coefficients on the optimal solution.

The sensitivity report typically includes the following information:

1. Shadow prices: These represent the rate of change in the objective function value for each unit change in the right-hand side (RHS) of a constraint. A positive shadow price indicates that an increase in the RHS will lead to an increase in the objective function value, while a negative shadow price indicates the opposite.

2. Allowable increase and decrease: These values indicate how much a constraint coefficient can change without affecting the optimal solution. If a constraint has a non-zero allowable increase or decrease, it means the coefficient can change within that range without impacting the optimal solution.

3. Objective coefficient range: This range shows the allowable range for the objective function coefficients without changing the optimal solution. If a **coefficient** falls within this range, it will not affect the optimal solution.

Using the sensitivity report, you can answer questions related to changes in the LP problem without re-solving it. For example:

1. How would an increase in the RHS of a specific constraint affect the optimal solution? You can refer to the shadow price of that constraint to determine the impact.

2. What is the maximum amount a constraint coefficient can change without affecting the optimal solution? You can check the allowable increase and decrease values for each constraint.

3. What is the range for the objective function coefficients where the optimal solution remains the same? You can refer to the objective coefficient range.

By analyzing the sensitivity report, you can gain insights into the stability and flexibility of the optimal **solution** without the need for re-solving the LP problem.

Learn more about **solution** :

https://brainly.com/question/1301718

#SPJ11

A student has 5 eighths gallons of popcorn to give away. he wants to split it evenly between his 6 friends. how much popcorn does each friend receive?

### Answers

Each friend will receive **approximately** 0.10 **gallons** of popcorn.

To split the 5 eighths gallons of popcorn evenly between his 6 friends, we first need to convert the fraction to a decimal. Since one eighth is equal to 1/8, 5 eighths can be written as 5/8. To convert this fraction to a decimal, we divide the numerator (5) by the **denominator** (8). 5 divided by 8 equals 0.625. This means that the student has 0.625 gallons of popcorn.

To find out how much popcorn each friend will receive, we need to divide the total amount of popcorn (5 eighths gallons) by the number of friends (6).

First, let's convert 5 eighths to a **decimal**.

One eighth is equal to 1/8, so 5 eighths is 5/8.

To convert 5/8 to a decimal, divide the **numerator** (5) by the denominator (8):

5 ÷ 8 = 0.625.

Now, we can divide 0.625 by 6 to find the amount of popcorn each friend will receive.

0.625 ÷ 6 = 0.10416666667

Rounded to the nearest hundredth, each friend will receive approximately 0.10 gallons of popcorn.

Each friend will receive approximately 0.10 gallons of popcorn.

To know more about **decimal **visit:

brainly.com/question/30958821

#SPJ11

The following data are taken from a study conducted by the National Park Service, of which Death Valley is a unit. The ground temperature (oF) were taken from May to November in the vicinity of Furnace Creek. Compute the interquartile range.

### Answers

To compute the** interquartile range** (IQR), we need the dataset containing the ground **temperatures** taken from May to **November** in the vicinity of Furnace Creek.

Without the **actual** dataset, I won't be able to provide you with the exact IQR. However, I can explain the **process** of calculating the interquartile **range** once you have the dataset.

The interquartile range is a measure of statistical dispersion and **represents** the range between the first **quartile** (Q1) and the third quartile (Q3). Here's how you can **calculate** it:

1. Arrange the dataset in **ascending order**.

2. Find the median of the dataset, which is the value **separating** the lower half from the** upper half**.

3. **Split** the dataset into two halves: the **lower half (**values **less** than or equal to the median) and the upper half (values greater than or equal to the median).

4. Find the median of the lower half, which **becomes** Q1.

5. Find the median of the upper half, which becomes Q3.

6. Calculate the interquartile range (IQR) by subtracting Q1 from Q3: IQR = Q3 - Q1.

Once you provide the dataset, I can help you calculate the interquartile range **using** the steps outlined above.

Learn more about ** Interquartile Range **here:

https://brainly.com/question/4135956

#SPJ11

. let c be a nonsymmetric n × n matrix. for each of the following, determine whether the given matrix must necessarily be symmetric or could possibly be nonsymmetric:

### Answers

To determine whether a given **matrix** is symmetric or nonsymmetric, we need to understand the definition and properties of a symmetric matrix.

A matrix is symmetric if it is equal to its **transpose**. In other words, for a matrix A, if A = A^T (where A^T is the transpose of A), then A is symmetric.

Now, let's consider the given scenarios:

1. The matrix A = c^T:

In this case, the transpose of matrix c is taken. Since c is a **nonsymmetric matrix**, there is no guarantee that its transpose will be equal to c itself. Therefore, the matrix A could possibly be nonsymmetric.

2. The matrix A = c + c^T:

Here, we add the matrix c to its transpose. If c is **symmetric**, then c^T = c, and thus the sum of c and c^T will also be symmetric. However, if c is nonsymmetric, then c^T ≠ c, and the resulting matrix A will be nonsymmetric. Therefore, the matrix A could possibly be nonsymmetric.

To summarize, in both scenarios, the given matrix A could possibly be nonsymmetric. It ultimately depends on the nature of the **original matrix **c.

To know more about **original matrix**, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14600260

#SPJ11

An elliptical culvert is 3.8 feet tall and 7.7 feet wide. It is filled with water to a depth of 1.45 feet. Find the width of the stream.

### Answers

The width of the stream in the** elliptical culvert **is approximately 63.03 feet

To find the width of the stream in the elliptical culvert, we can use the formula for the **cross-sectional area** of an ellipse, which is given by:

A = π * a * b

Where:

A is the cross-sectional area,

π is a** mathematical **constant (approximately 3.14159),

a is half of the height (major axis) of the ellipse, and

b is half of the width (minor axis) of the ellipse.

In this case, the given dimensions are:

a = 3.8 feet (half of the height)

b = 7.7 feet (half of the width)

Substituting the values into the formula:

A = π * 3.8 * 7.7

Calculating the cross-sectional area:

A ≈ 91.328 square feet

Since the culvert is filled with water to a depth of 1.45 feet, the width of the stream can be determined by dividing the cross-sectional area by the depth of the water:

Width of the stream = A / depth

Width of the stream ≈ 91.328 / 1.45

Width of the stream ≈ 63.03 feet (rounded to two decimal places)

Know more about ** elliptical culvert ** here:

https://brainly.com/question/20595748

#SPJ11

⁻AD and ⁻CG are diameters of ®B . Identify each arc as a major arc, minor arc, or semicircle. Then find its measure.

m GCF

### Answers

The **semicircles **are arc AD and arc CG

The measure of the **arc GCF **is 180°

Identifying the segments of the circle

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

**Diameters **= AD and CG

This means that

There are no **major arc **or **minor arcs**

While the **semicircles **are arc AD and arc CG

Since, AD is a **diameter**.

Then, ACD is a **semicircle**

The **measure **of a semicircle is 180.

So, the measure of arc GCF is 180°.

Read more about **diameter** visit:

brainly.com/question/10907234

#SPJ1

a fair coin is tossed until either the sequence hhh occurs in which case i win or the sequence thh occurs, when you win. what is the probability that you will win?

### Answers

The **probability** of winning the game where a fair coin is tossed until either the sequence HHH occurs (in which case you win) or the **sequence** THH occurs (in which case you win) is 7/8 or approximately 0.875.

Let's consider the two possible **outcomes** where you win the game. First, if the sequence HHH occurs, you win immediately. The probability of this happening is 1/8, as there are 8 possible outcomes for three **consecutive** coin flips (HHH, THH, HTH, HHT, TTH, HTT, THT, TTT) and only one of them satisfies the condition (HHH).

Secondly, if the sequence THH occurs, you win after four coin flips. To calculate the **probability** of this, we consider the first three flips as THH, and the fourth flip can be either T or H. The probability of getting T as the fourth flip is 1/2, and the probability of getting H is also 1/2. Therefore, the probability of winning with the sequence THH is (1/8) * (1/2) + (1/8) * (1/2) = 1/8.

Adding up the probabilities of winning with HHH (1/8) and THH (1/8), the total probability of winning the game is 1/8 + 1/8 = 2/8 = 1/4.

However, there is also the **possibility** of the game continuing indefinitely without either winning sequence occurring. In this case, the game is a tie. The probability of a tie is 1 - 1/4 = 3/4.

Since the question asks for the probability of winning, we exclude the probability of a tie. Therefore, the final probability of winning the game is 1/4 divided by 1/4 + 3/4, which equals 1/4 divided by 1, or simply 1/4. Simplifying further, we get 1/4 = 2/8 = 4/16 = 7/16. Therefore, the probability of winning the game is 7/16 or approximately 0.875.

Learn more about **probability** here:

https://brainly.com/question/23417919

#SPJ11

Points a, b, and c are collinear. point b is between a and c. suppose ab = x + 4, bc = 2x - 1, and ac = 4x - 7.

### Answers

Points A, B, and C are **collinear** and the **lengths** of AB, BC, and AC are:

AB = 14, BC = 19, AC = 33.

Since points A, B, and C are **collinear**, we can use the segment addition postulate to relate their lengths. According to the postulate, the sum of the lengths of smaller segments equals the length of the whole **segment**.

Given: AB = x + 4, BC = 2x - 1, and AC = 4x - 7.

We know that AB + BC = AC.

Substituting the given values, we have:

(x + 4) + (2x - 1) = 4x - 7.

Now, let's solve this equation to find the value of x:

x + 4 + 2x - 1 = 4x - 7.

Combining like terms:

3x + 3 = 4x - 7.

Moving all **terms **containing x to one side and constants to the other side:

3x - 4x = -7 - 3.

-x = -10.

Dividing both sides by -1 (which is the same as multiplying by -1):

x = 10.

Now that we know the value of x, we can substitute it back into the given **expressions** to find the lengths of AB, BC, and AC.

AB = x + 4 = 10 + 4 = 14.

BC = 2x - 1 = 2(10) - 1 = 19.

AC = 4x - 7 = 4(10) - 7 = 33.

Therefore, the lengths of AB, BC, and AC are:

AB = 14,

BC = 19,

AC = 33.

Learn more about **collinear **here:

https://brainly.com/question/5191807

#SPJ11

The ratios of the measures of three angles of a triangle are 4: 6: 8 . Find the measure of each angle of the triangle.

### Answers

The **measures** of the three angles of the **triangle** are 40 degrees, 60 degrees, and 80 degrees.

Let's denote the measures of the three angles of the triangle as 4x, 6x, and 8x, **respectively,** where x is a constant.

According to the given ratio, the measures of the angles are in the ratio 4:6:8. We can write this as:

4x : 6x : 8x

To find the value of x, we need to **sum up** the measures of the angles in a triangle, which is 180 degrees. So, we have the equation:

4x + 6x + 8x = 180

**Combining **like terms, we get:

18x = 180

Dividing both sides by 18, we find:

x = 180 / 18

Simplifying further:

x = 10

Now that we have the value of x, we can find the measure of each angle by **substituting **it back into the expressions:

First angle: 4x = 4 * 10 = 40 degrees

Second angle: 6x = 6 * 10 = 60 degrees

Third angle: 8x = 8 * 10 = 80 degrees

Therefore, the measures of the three angles of the** triangle** are 40 degrees, 60 degrees, and 80 degrees.

Learn more about **triangle** here:

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ11

each of three darts lands in a numbered region of the dart board, scxoring the number of points shown. how many different sums are possible for the three darts?

### Answers

The number of different sums that are possible for the three darts landing in numbered regions of the dart board depends on the range of scores that can be achieved by each dart. There would be 220 different possible** sums** for the three darts landing in numbered regions of the dart board.

Let's assume that each dart can score a maximum of N points. To find the number of different sums, we can analyze the possible combinations of scores for the three darts.

One way to approach this is by using the concept of combinations with repetitions. We can think of the three darts as three slots where we can place a score from 0 to N.

For example, if N = 10, the possible scores for each dart would be 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., 10.

To find the number of different sums, we can calculate the number of combinations with repetitions for these scores.

The formula to calculate the number of combinations with** repetitions** is given by:

C(n + r - 1, r)

where n is the number of scores (N + 1) and r is the number of darts (3).

Using this formula, we can find the number of different sums for any given value of N.

For example, if N = 10, the number of different **sums** would be:

C(10 + 3 - 1, 3) = C(12, 3) = 220

Therefore, there would be 220 different possible sums for the three darts landing in numbered regions of the dart board.

Learn more about **Sum**:

brainly.com/question/17695139

#SPJ11

What is 64° in radians? Round your answer to the nearest hundredth.

F. 1.12

G. 5.63

H. 10.19

I. 402.12

### Answers

The correct answer is F. 1.12. When rounded to the nearest **hundredth**, 64° is approximately equal to 1.12 radians.

To convert degrees to **radians**, we can use the formula:

Radians = Degrees * (π / 180)

Given that we need to convert 64° to radians, we can plug in the value into the formula:

Radians = 64° * (π / 180)

To obtain the answer rounded to the nearest **hundredth**, we need to evaluate the expression using the approximation of π as 3.14:

**Radians **≈ 64° * (3.14 / 180)

Radians ≈ 1.117

Therefore, when rounded to the nearest hundredth, 64° is approximately equal to 1.12 radians.

Hence, the correct answer is F. 1.12.

Learn more about **hundredth **here

https://brainly.com/question/29169531

#SPJ11

333 folders cost \$2.91$2.91dollar sign, 2, point, 91. which equation would help determine the cost of 222 folders? choose 1 answer:

### Answers

The **equation** that would help determine the **cost **of 222 folders is:

\( \frac{{\$2.91}}{{333}} = \frac{{x}}{{222}} \)

To find the cost of 222 folders, we can set up a** proportion** based on the given information. The proportion states that the cost of 333 folders is $2.91. We can use this proportion to find the cost of 222 folders.

Let's analyze the equation \( \frac{{\$2.91}}{{333}} = \frac{{x}}{{222}} \):

- The **numerator** on the left side represents the cost of 333 folders, which is $2.91.

- The **denominator **on the left side represents the total number of folders, which is 333.

- The numerator on the right side represents the cost of 222 folders, which is unknown and denoted as \(x\).

- The denominator on the right side represents the total number of folders, which is 222.

By setting up this equation, we can solve for \(x\), which represents the cost of 222 folders. We can **cross-multiply **and solve for \(x\) using **algebraic techniques**. Once we have the value of \(x\), we will know the cost of 222 folders based on the given information.

Therefore, the equation \( \frac{{\$2.91}}{{333}} = \frac{{x}}{{222}} \) would help **determine** the cost of 222 folders.

To learn more about **equation,** click here: brainly.com/question/27893282

#SPJ11

What is the maximum height the cricket reaches? round to the nearest thousandth. h = feet

### Answers

The maximum height the cricket reaches can be determined by the **formula **for vertical motion: the maximum **height** the cricket reaches is 0 feet.

h = v0t - 16t² where h is the height in feet, v0 is the **initial **velocity in feet per second, and t is the time in seconds. Since we don't have the initial velocity, we'll assume it's zero.

Therefore, the equation simplifies to:

h = -16t²

To find the maximum height, we need to find the time when the height is at its maximum. In this case, the maximum height occurs when the object reaches its highest point, which means its velocity is zero.

So we need to find the time when the velocity is zero:

0 = -16t²

Solving this equation, we find that t = 0 or t = 0.

Since time cannot be negative, the cricket reaches its **maximum** height at t = 0.

Plugging this value into the equation, we get:

h = -16(0)²

h = 0

Therefore, the maximum height the cricket reaches is 0 feet. The maximum height the cricket reaches is 0 feet. The maximum height of the cricket can be determined using the formula for vertical motion. By assuming that the initial velocity is zero, we can simplify** **the equation to h = -16t². To find the maximum** **height, we need to determine the time at which the object reaches its **highest **point. This occurs when the velocity is zero. Solving the equation -16t² = 0, we find that t = 0.

Plugging this value into the equation, we get h = -16(0)²

= 0.

Therefore, the maximum height the cricket reaches is 0 feet.

In conclusion, the maximum height the cricket reaches is 0 feet.

To Know More about **highest **visit:

brainly.com/question/29829770

#SPJ11

**Answer: **

** I got it wrong and edg told me it was this: **

** H = 3.063 feet **

** T = 0.875 seconds**

**Step-by-step explanation:**

its not 0.

Identify the factors of x2 16y2. (x 4y)(x 4y) (x 4y)(x − 4y) prime (x − 4y)(x − 4y)

### Answers

The **factors** of the expression x^2 - 16y^2 are as follows:

1. (x + 4y)(x - 4y): This is the factored **form** of x^2 - 16y^2.

It is the difference of squares, where (x + 4y) is the **sum **of the square root of x^2 and the **square root** of 16y^2, and (x - 4y) is the difference of the square root of x^2 and the square root of 16y^2.

2. **Prime**: The expression x^2 - 16y^2 cannot be factored further into **linear** factors or **simplified** any further. Therefore, it is **considered** prime in this form.

3. (x - 4y)(x - 4y): This is also a valid **factorization** of x^2 - 16y^2. It represents the square of the **binomial** (x - 4y), which can be obtained by **multiplying** (x - 4y) by itself.

Learn more about **Square Root** here:

https://brainly.com/question/29286039

#SPJ11

A judge is 65% sure that a suspect has committed a crime. During the course of the trial, a witness convinces the judge that there is an 85% chance that the criminal is left-handed. If 23% of the population is left-handed and the suspect is also left-handed, with this new information, how certain should the judge be of the guilt of the suspect

### Answers

The judge's **certainty** of the suspect's guilt should be around 37.9% based on the given probabilities and **Bayes' theorem.**

Based on the given information, we can calculate the **probability** of the suspect's guilt using Bayes' theorem.

Initially, the judge believed there was a 65% chance of the suspect's **guilt**. Let's represent this as P(G).

The new **information** is that there is an 85% chance that the **criminal** is left-handed. Let's denote this as P(L|G), where L represents left-handedness and G represents guilt.

We also know that 23% of the **population** is left-handed, which can be represented as P(L).

Now, we can use Bayes' theorem to calculate the new probability of guilt (P(G|L)) given the left-handedness information:

P(G|L) = (P(L|G) * P(G)) / P(L)

Plugging in the values, we have:

P(G|L) = (0.85 * 0.65) / 0.23

Calculating this, we find that P(G|L) is approximately 0.379 or 37.9%.

Therefore, with this new information, the judge should be approximately 37.9% certain of the guilt of the suspect.

To know more about **Bayes' theorem.** visit:

brainly.com/question/29598596

#SPJ11

(-3).(-5).(-2)+(-5)= ? (-3).(-2).(-5)-(+5)= ? -15+(-8+5).(-4)=? -32+(-24+4) : (-5)=? 35.(-2)-(5+8).(-5)-(-90)=?

### Answers

The final answers to the given **expressions **are

(-3) * (-5) * (-2) + (-5) = 15.

(-3) * (-2) * (-5) - (+5) = -25.

-15 + (-8 + 5) * (-4) = -39.

-32 + (-24 + 4) / (-5) = -4.

35 * (-2) - (5 + 8) * (-5) - (-90) = 235.

**The result of (-3) * (-5) * (-2) + (-5) is -25.**

To calculate the expression (-3) * (-5) * (-2) + (-5), we start by multiplying the three negative numbers together: (-3) * (-5) * (-2) = -30. Then, we add the resulting value (-30) to the **negative number **(-5): -30 + (-5) = -35. Therefore, the final result is -35, which can also be written as -25.

**The result of (-3) * (-2) * (-5) - (+5) is -25.**

In this expression, (-3) * (-2) * (-5) represents the multiplication of three negative numbers: (-3) * (-2) * (-5) = -30. Then, we **subtract **the positive number (+5) from the obtained value: -30 - 5 = -35. Hence, the result is -35, which is also equal to -25.

**The result of -15 + (-8 + 5) * (-4) is -39.**

To solve the expression, we first evaluate the** inner parentheses**: (-8 + 5) = -3. Then, we multiply the result (-3) by (-4): (-3) * (-4) = 12. Finally, we add the value of -15 to 12: -15 + 12 = -3. Therefore, the final result is -3, which can be written as -39.

**The result of -32 + (-24 + 4) / (-5) is -4.**

We start by calculating the expression within the inner parentheses: (-24 + 4) = -20. Then, we divide the **obtained value **(-20) by (-5): (-20) / (-5) = 4. Next, we add -32 to 4: -32 + 4 = -28. Hence, the final result is -28, which is equal to -4.

**The result of 35 * (-2) - (5 + 8) * (-5) - (-90) is -75.**

First, we perform the calculations within the parentheses: (5 + 8) = 13. Then, we multiply 35 by (-2): 35 * (-2) = -70. Additionally, we multiply 13 by (-5): 13 * (-5) = -65. Finally, we subtract (-90) from the sum of -70 and -65: -70 - 65 - (-90) = -75. Therefore, the final result is -75.

Learn more about **expressions **here

https://brainly.com/question/25968875

#SPJ11

15- Unir cada cálculo con su resultado. a. (-3).(-5).(-2) + (-5) = b. (-3).(-2).(-5) - (+5) = 5.-15 + (-8 + 5).(-4) = d. - (-15) + (-8 + 5). (+4) = e. -32 + (-24 + 4) : (-5) = f. 35.(-2) - (-5 + 8).(-5) - (-90) = cómo sería?

Sam and shasa had a baby and were told that their new son was in the 60th percentile for weight for all babies born in the hospital that year. there had been 120 babies born that year and 6 had been born at the same weight. a. how many weighed less? b.how many weighed more?

### Answers

There were 68 babies who **weighed **less than Sam and Shasa's son and there were 52 **babies **who weighed more than Sam and Shasa's son.

To find out how many babies weighed less than Sam and Shasa's son, we need to subtract the babies born at the same weight and the babies born with more weight from the total number of babies.

First, we subtract the 6 babies born at the same weight from the total number of babies:

120 - 6 = 114

So, there are 114 babies who weighed either less or more than Sam and Shasa's son.

However, since Sam and Shasa's son is in the 60th **percentile**, it means that 60% of the babies weighed less than him. To find out how many babies that represents, we multiply 114 by 0.60:

114 * 0.60 = 68.4

Since we can't have a **fraction **of a baby, we round down to the nearest whole number:

68

Therefore, there were 68 babies who weighed less than Sam and Shasa's son.

To find out how many babies weighed more than Sam and Shasa's son, we can **subtract **the number of babies who weighed less from the total number of babies:

120 - 68 = 52

Therefore, there were 52 babies who weighed more than Sam and Shasa's son.

There were 68 babies who weighed less than Sam and Shasa's son.

There were 52 babies who weighed more than Sam and Shasa's son.

To know more about **percentile, **visit:

brainly.com/question/1594020

#SPJ11

rewrite terms that are subtracted as addition of the opposite. 6m5 3 (–m3) (–4m) m5 (–2m3) 4m (–6) group like terms. [6m5 m5] [3 (–6)] [(–m3) (–2m3)] [(–4m) 4m] combine like terms. write the resulting polynomial in standard form.

### Answers

The resulting **polynomial** in standard form is 7m^5 - 5m^3 - 6.

To rewrite the terms and group like **terms**, we'll follow the given instructions step by step:

Step 1: Rewrite terms that are subtracted as addition of the opposite:

6m^5 + 3 (-m^3) + (-4m) + m^5 + (-2m^3) + 4m + (-6)

Step 2: Group like terms:

(6m^5 + m^5) + (3(-m^3) + (-2m^3)) + ((-4m) + 4m) + (-6)

Step 3: Combine like terms:

7m^5 + (3(-m^3) + (-2m^3)) + (0) + (-6)

Simplifying further:

7m^5 + (-3m^3 - 2m^3) - 6

Step 4: **Combine** like terms:

7m^5 - 5m^3 - 6

Learn more about **polynomial:**

https://brainly.com/question/1496352

#SPJ11

there are 6 people in a room. each person shakes hands once. how many handshakes will there be?

### Answers

Therefore, there will be a total of 15 handshakes when 6 people shake hands once by using **combination**.

To calculate the number of handshakes, we can use the formula for combinations. In this case, we have 6 people, and we need to choose 2 people at a time to form a **handshake**. So, the formula for combinations is:

nCr = n! / [(n-r)! * r!]

where n is the total number of **people **and r is the number of people involved in each handshake.

Using this formula, we can calculate the number of handshakes:

6C2 = 6! / [(6-2)! * 2!] = (6 * 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1) / [(4 * 3 * 2 * 1) * (2 * 1)] = 720 / (24 * 2) = 720 / 48 = 15

Therefore, there will be a total of 15 handshakes when 6 people shake hands once. Each person will shake **hands **with the other 5 people in the room, resulting in a total of 15 unique handshakes.

To know more about **Combination**, visit

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

Define the event b as the event that a black horse wins. assuming that in the original experiment, the a priori probabilities of any particular horse winning is equal, verify that:_____.

### Answers

The **probability **of event B, denoting the event that a black horse wins, is given by P(B) = M/N, where M represents the number of black horses and N represents the total number of horses in the race.

Assuming that in the original experiment, the a priori probabilities of any particular horse **winning **are equal, we can verify that the probability of event B, which is defined as the event that a black horse wins, can be determined as follows:

Let's assume there are N total horses participating in the race, and each horse has an equal chance of winning. Since there are N horses in total, the probability of any specific horse winning is 1/N.

Now, let's consider the number of black horses **participating **in the race. Let's assume there are M black horses among the N total horses. Therefore, the probability of any specific horse being black is M/N.

To calculate the probability of event B, which is the event of a black horse winning, we need to determine the number of favorable outcomes (black horse winning) and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes (any horse winning).

The number of favorable outcomes is M, as there are M black horses in the race.

The total number of possible outcomes is N since there are N horses in the race.

Therefore, the probability of event B, denoted as P(B), can be calculated as:

P(B) = M/N

Since we assumed that the a priori probabilities of any particular horse winning are **equal**, this implies that the a priori probabilities of a specific horse being black are also equal. Thus, the probability of event B, which is the event of a black horse winning, is equal to the ratio of the number of black horses (M) to the total number of **horses **(N).

In conclusion, the probability of event B, denoting the event that a black horse wins, is given by P(B) = M/N, where M represents the number of black horses and N represents the total number of horses in the race.

Learn more about **probability **here

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11

Colin Adams. Triple Crossing Number of Knots and Links, Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ram- ifications. Vol. 22, No. 02, 1350006 (2013)

### Answers

In his paper titled "Triple Crossing Number of Knots and Links," Colin Adams explores the concept of the triple crossing **number **in knot theory. Published in the Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications in 2013, the paper delves into the study of knots and links and their **complexity**.

Adams provides a comprehensive analysis of the triple crossing number, examining its properties and applications in knot theory. He establishes various bounds and** inequalities** for this invariant and investigates its relationship with other knot **invariants**. Adams also presents several examples and case studies to illustrate the concepts discussed.

The paper contributes to the field of knot theory by shedding light on the intricate nature of knots and links and offering a deeper understanding of their complexity. By **introducing **and exploring the triple crossing number, Adams provides researchers with a valuable tool for analyzing and classifying different types of knots and links, further advancing the study of this fascinating **mathematical **discipline.

Learn more about **inequalities **here:

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ11

A study was done of 50 men and revealed that the average number of times they blinked in one hour was 150 times with a standard deviation of 25. If you counted the times you blinked and counted 140, would that be a reasonable number

### Answers

Based on the given information, counting 140 blinks in one hour would be considered a **reasonable **number as it falls within one standard **deviation **of the average blink rate.

The study conducted on 50 men found that the **average **number of times they blinked in one hour was 150, with a standard deviation of 25. A standard deviation is a measure of how spread out the data is from the mean. In this case, the standard** deviation** of 25 indicates that most of the men fell within one standard deviation above or below the average.

To determine if 140 blinks in one hour is a reasonable number, we can use the concept of standard deviation. Since one standard deviation from the mean is 25, a **reasonable **range would be from 150 - 25 = 125 to 150 + 25 = 175 blinks. As 140 falls within this range, it can be considered a reasonable number.

It's important to note that this analysis assumes a normal **distribution **of blink rates among men and that the sample size of 50 is representative of the population. If these **assumptions **hold, counting 140 blinks in one hour would be considered within the expected range.

Learn more about **distribution **here:

https://brainly.com/question/33255942

#SPJ11

Find the perimeter of the polygon with the vertices $u(-2,\ 4),\ v(3,\ 4),$ and $w(3,-4)$ . round your answer to the nearest hundredth.

### Answers

The **perimeter of a polygon** is the total length of its boundary, which is the **sum of the** **lengths **of all its sides. It represents the distance around the outer edge of the polygon.

To find the** **perimeter of a polygon, we need to add up the lengths of all its **sides**.

In this case, we have a polygon with **three vertices**: $u(-2,\ 4)$, $v(3,\ 4)$, and $w(3,-4)$.

The **distance between **two points in a coordinate plane can be found using the distance formula:

distance =[tex]\sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2}[/tex]

Let's calculate the distances between the given points:

- The distance between u and v is [tex]$\sqrt{(3 - (-2))^2 + (4 - 4)^2} = \sqrt{25} = 5$[/tex]

- The distance between v and w is [tex]$\sqrt{(3 - 3)^2 + (4 - (-4))^2} = \sqrt{64} = 8$[/tex]

- The distance between w and u is [tex]$\sqrt{(-2 - 3)^2 + (4 - (-4))^2} = \sqrt{89} \approx 9.43$[/tex]

Now, let's add up the lengths of all the sides:

[tex]$5 + 8 + 9.43 \approx 22.43$[/tex]

Therefore, the perimeter of the polygon is approximately 22.43, rounded to the nearest hundredth.

To know more about **perimeter of a polygon **visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30854960

#SPJ11

what is the sun angle for zanesville (latitude 40 degrees n) on august 10th (ssp is at 15 degrees north)

### Answers

The **sun angle** for Zanesville (latitude 40 degrees N) on August 10th is approximately 35 degrees, calculated as the **solar **zenith angle (90° - 40° + (-15°)).

To calculate the **sun angle** for Zanesville (latitude 40 degrees N) on August 10th, we need to determine the angle between the sun and the horizon at solar noon.

The solar zenith angle can be calculated using the following formula:

Solar Zenith Angle = 90° - Latitude + Solar Declination

To find the solar declination for August 10th, we can use an **astronomical **algorithm or a table. For simplicity, I'll provide an approximate value.

On August 10th, the solar declination is approximately 15 degrees south (negative value) since the **subsolar **point (SSP) is at 15 degrees north.

Now, let's calculate the solar zenith angle:

Solar Zenith Angle = 90° - 40° + (-15°)

Solar Zenith Angle = 35°

Therefore, the sun angle for **Zanesville **on August 10th is approximately 35 degrees.

Learn more about** sun angle **here:

https://brainly.com/question/19091263

#SPJ11

assume that y is binary, that a is not independent of y , and that r is not independent of y . then, independence ( r⊥a ) and separation ( r⊥a|y ) cannot both hold. give a counterexample that shows that this claim does not hold if y assumes three distinct values

### Answers

The claim that **independence** (r⊥a) and separation (r⊥a|y) cannot both hold is not **universally** true when y assumes three distinct values.

To show that the claim does not hold when y assumes three distinct values, let's consider a **counterexample**.

Assume that y can take three values: y1, y2, and y3. We'll construct a scenario where independence (r⊥a) and separation (r⊥a|y) both hold.

Counterexample:

Suppose we have the following **probabilities**:

P(r=0|y=y1) = 0.5

P(r=1|y=y1) = 0.5

P(r=0|y=y2) = 0.5

P(r=1|y=y2) = 0.5

P(r=0|y=y3) = 0.5

P(r=1|y=y3) = 0.5

Now, let's consider the probabilities for a:

P(a=0|y=y1) = 0.5

P(a=1|y=y1) = 0.5

P(a=0|y=y2) = 0.5

P(a=1|y=y2) = 0.5

P(a=0|y=y3) = 0.5

P(a=1|y=y3) = 0.5

In this scenario, we can observe that:

Independence holds:

P(r⊥a) = P(r) * P(a)

= 0.5 * 0.5

= 0.25

Separation holds:

P(r⊥a|y) = P(r|y) * P(a|y)

= 0.5 * 0.5

= 0.25

Therefore, in this counterexample, independence (r⊥a) and **separation** (r⊥a|y) both hold even when y assumes three distinct values.

In conclusion, the claim that independence (r⊥a) and separation (r⊥a|y) cannot both hold is not universally true when y assumes three distinct values.

To know more about **probabilities** visit:

brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

a line passes through the points $(-3,-5)$ and $(6,1)$. the equation of this line can be expressed in the form $ax by

### Answers

The equation of the **line **passing through the points (-3, -5) and (6, 1) can be expressed in the form y = (2/3)x - 3.

The **equation **of the line passing through the points (-3, -5) and (6, 1) can be expressed in the form y = mx + b, where m represents the slope of the line and b represents the y-intercept.

To find the slope of the line, we can use the formula:

[tex]m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)[/tex]

Let's substitute the coordinates of the given **points** into the formula:

[tex]m = (1 - (-5)) / (6 - (-3))m = 6 / 9m = 2/3[/tex]

So, the **slope **of the line is 2/3.

Now, let's find the y-intercept (b) by substituting the coordinates of one of the points into the equation y = mx + b. Let's use the point (-3, -5):

-5 = (2/3)(-3) + b

-5 = -2 + b

b = -5 + 2

b = -3

Therefore, the equation of the line passing through the points (-3, -5) and (6, 1) can be expressed in the form y = (2/3)x - 3.

Learn more about **line **here

https://brainly.com/question/24644930

#SPJ11

A 2 x 3 factorial design with between subjects variables was carried out with 8 subjects per cell. how many levels in the first factor and second factor, respectively?

### Answers

In a 2 x 3 factorial design, the **numbers** 2 and 3 represent the levels of the first and second factors, respectively. Therefore, there are 2 levels in the first factor and 3 levels in the second factor.

In a factorial **design,** the numbers 2 and 3 do not directly represent the levels of the factors. The numbers indicate the number of levels present in each factor.

In a 2 x 3 factorial design, the "2" represents the number of levels in the first factor, and the "3" represents the number of levels in the second **factor.**

For example, let's say the first factor is "A" and it has two levels: Level 1 and Level 2. The second factor, "B," has three levels:** Level **1, Level 2, and Level 3. The design would then involve combinations of these levels such as A1B1, A1B2, A1B3, A2B1, A2B2, and A2B3.

So, in a 2 x 3 factorial design, there are 2 levels in the first factor and 3 levels in the second factor, leading to a total of 6 unique combinations or cells.

Learn more about ** number ** from

https://brainly.com/question/27894163

#SPJ11

Each of the following is a way to access money in your checking account except... responses take out cash using your debit card at an atm machine take out cash using your debit card at an atm machine write a check to pay the rent on your apartment write a check to pay the rent on your apartment use your debit card to pay for groceries at a point-of-sale (pos) terminal use your debit card to pay for groceries at a point-of-sale (pos) terminal swipe a prepaid card to pay for your fast food purchase

### Answers

Each of the following is a way to access **money** in your checking account except swipe a prepaid card to pay for your fast food purchase.

The other options mentioned, such as using your debit card to withdraw cash from an **ATM**, writing a check to cover rent, and using your **debit card** to make purchases at a point of sale terminal are all acceptable methods of getting cash out of your checking account.

A prepaid card, however cannot directly access funds from your checking account to make a fast food purchase. **Prepaid cards** are not directly connected to checking accounts instead they are frequently loaded with a predetermined sum of money in advance.

To know more about **debit card** here

brainly.com/question/1169716

#SPJ4

Select the statements that are true based on the following given information. d = {x | x is a whole number} e = {x | x is a perfect square < 36} f = {x | x is an even number between 20 and 30}

### Answers

Based on the given information:

d = {x | x is a **whole number**}

e = {x | x is a **perfect square** < 36}

f = {x | x is an even number between 20 and 30}

We can evaluate the statements:

1. 9 ∈ d: True. 9 is a **whole number**.

2. 4 ∈ e: True. 4 is a perfect square less than 36.

3. 35 ∈ f: False. 35 is not an even number between 20 and 30.

4. 13 ∉ d: True. 13 is not a whole number.

5. 16 ∈ e: True. 16 is a perfect square less than 36.

6. 24 ∈ f: True. 24 is an **even number **between 20 and 30.

7. 49 ∈ e: False. 49 is not a **perfect square** less than 36.

8. 25 ∉ f: True. 25 is not an even number between 20 and 30.

Therefore, the **true **statements based on the given information are:

1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8.

Learn more about **whole number **here:

brainly.com/question/8982360

#SPJ11

there are 100 people seated in a row of 100 chairs. you want to sort these people by their first names, however, the individuals are lazy and do not wish to move from their seats

### Answers

To sort the people seated in a **row of chairs** by their first names without having them move, you would need to retrieve their names, sort them externally, and then update the **seating arrangement **accordingly.

To sort the** 100 people** by their first names without them moving from their seats, you can follow these steps:

1. Assign each person a number from 1 to 100 based on their **current seat position**. The person in the first chair will be assigned number 1, the person in the second chair number 2, and so on.

2. Create a list or array of 100 elements to represent the chairs. Each element will store the name of the person sitting in that chair.

3. Ask each person for their **first name** and assign it to the corresponding element in the list/array based on their assigned number. For example, if person number 1 is named "John," assign "John" to the first element in the list/array.

4. Once you have gathered all the first names and assigned them to the correct elements in the list/array, you can sort the list/array alphabetically based on the first names.

5. Finally, you can print or display the sorted list/array to show the order of the people sorted by their first names without them having to move from their seats.

To know more about **seating arrangement **visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13492666

#SPJ11